This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rico Gloeckner
rg at teamix.net
Fri Mar 21 10:53:53 CET 2008
Hello, On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:58:00PM +0100, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > PDP Number: 2008-02 > Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR I am opposing to this PDP. I have already seen that customers of a LIR announce the LIRs /32 because the LIR isnt interested in deploying IPv6. One may describe this as a (probably illegal) transfer of resources. Fulfilling the PDP will open a whole new can of worms if there arent some other prerequisites met. MfG/regards, -- Rico Gloeckner System Engineer team(ix) GmbH Suedwestpark 35 90449 Nuernberg Amtsgericht Nuernberg, HRB 18320 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Oliver Kuegow, Richard Mueller
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]