[address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rico Gloeckner
rg at teamix.net
Fri Mar 21 10:53:53 CET 2008
Hello, On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:58:00PM +0100, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > PDP Number: 2008-02 > Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR I am opposing to this PDP. I have already seen that customers of a LIR announce the LIRs /32 because the LIR isnt interested in deploying IPv6. One may describe this as a (probably illegal) transfer of resources. Fulfilling the PDP will open a whole new can of worms if there arent some other prerequisites met. MfG/regards, -- Rico Gloeckner System Engineer team(ix) GmbH Suedwestpark 35 90449 Nuernberg Amtsgericht Nuernberg, HRB 18320 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Oliver Kuegow, Richard Mueller
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]