[address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)

Thu Mar 20 20:04:19 CET 2008

On 20/03/2008 17:57, "Leo Vegoda" <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote:

[...]

> If an LIR gets an IPv6 allocation this way and does not want it or use it,
> might their annual fee rise as a result? It's important not to move someone
> from the 'extra small' to the 'small' billing category because they received
> an IPv6 allocation they did not request.

It looks like I missed the statement about this in the analysis the RIPE NCC
provided and the answer is "probably not".

Leo