This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Gondek
drixter at e-utp.net
Wed Jan 16 12:26:41 CET 2008
michael.dillon at bt.com pisze: >> If the price will be higher, then everybody join to RIPE as >> LIR. And then we will have +1000% of LIRs. Do "we" need this? >> Now everybody is waiting for some kind of statesment or >> procedure from RIPE side. >> > > If the organizations which receive IPv6 PI allocations, join RIPE > and sign a contract and pay an annual fee, they would not be > LIRs (Local Internet Registries) because they will not have the > right to reassign parts of their address allocation. > > RIPE needs to have another class of member that is not an LIR. > > Ok, who will make it? RIPE itself or "we" need another proposal? -- Marcin Gondek / Drixter e-utp.net NIP: PL1181589645 REGON: 140584662 Tel. +48602159929 Fax. +48222012418 office at e-utp.net http://www.e-utp.net
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]