[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Jan 16 12:27:51 CET 2008
> If the price will be higher, then everybody join to RIPE as > LIR. And then we will have +1000% of LIRs. Do "we" need this? > Now everybody is waiting for some kind of statesment or > procedure from RIPE side. If the organizations which receive IPv6 PI allocations, join RIPE and sign a contract and pay an annual fee, they would not be LIRs (Local Internet Registries) because they will not have the right to reassign parts of their address allocation. RIPE needs to have another class of member that is not an LIR. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]