[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Fri Dec 5 09:34:08 CET 2008
Gert Doering said: > > Interesting that 52 attendees out of 6000 RIPE members are able to make > > such a change. > > Note that I'm not a lawyer - but as far as I understand, this is how the > articles of the NCC are set up. The majority of the LIRs (+proxy votes) > that attend the AGM vote for the board members and decide on the charging > scheme (and possible changes to the articles). But what is the quorum for the meeting? Is it really as small as under 1%? If the meeting isn't quorate, its decisions are invalid. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 THUS - a Cable and Wireless business
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]