[address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Tue Dec 2 21:33:27 CET 2008
> I can only second Niels here. While organizing conferences > and events with network infrastructure myself, I can tell > that it is a hassle to re-arrange temporary PI every time... > so I do see the incentive. But why should the NCC be a > special case and no one else? I agree that it would be fairer to change the policy so that any conference organizer can apply for a PI IPv6 address block. They fill the role of a network operator for the attendees of a conference and this should be sufficient justification. IPv6 address space is NOT in short supply and we should not treat it as a scarce resource at this time. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]