[address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elisa Jasinska
elisa.jasinska at ams-ix.net
Tue Dec 2 17:18:16 CET 2008
I can only second Niels here. While organizing conferences and events with network infrastructure myself, I can tell that it is a hassle to re-arrange temporary PI every time... so I do see the incentive. But why should the NCC be a special case and no one else? Cheers, Elisa -- Elisa Jasinska - AMS-IX NOC http://www.ams-ix.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]