[address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ian.Meikle at nominet.org.uk
Ian.Meikle at nominet.org.uk
Tue Apr 8 17:55:08 CEST 2008
address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net wrote on 08/04/2008 16:29:22: > Frederic <frederic at placenet.org> > Sent by: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net > > 08/04/08 16:29 > > To > > Ian.Meikle at nominet.org.uk > > cc > > address-policy-wg at ripe.net > > Subject > > Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct > Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC) > > Le mardi 08 avril 2008 à 16:09 +0100, Ian.Meikle at nominet.org.uk a > écrit : > > > Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> > > > Sent by: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net > > > > > > 08/04/08 13:29 > > > > > > To > > > > > > Frederic <frederic at placenet.org>, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> > > > > > > cc > > > > > > Max Tulyev <president at ukraine.su>, "address-policy-wg at ripe.net" > > > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> > > > > > > Subject > > > > > > Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct > > > Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC) > > > > > > Hi Frederic, > > > > > > On 08/04/2008 03:58, "Frederic" <frederic at placenet.org> wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > why is broken ? because Ripe do not implement relation between PI > > holder > > > > thru Database information. > > > > > > > > Dead PI is like Dead Domain name. > > > > > > This is a fairly good analogy. My understanding of domain names is that > > they > > > are normally delegated according to a contract with a registry or > > registrar. > > > If the contract ends the delegation is removed. > > > > > There is a thriving market in 'dead' domain names. Several of our > > registrars base their business models around buying them and reviving them. > > For this to work they need to have a contract with us, and they need to pay > > a fee per domain name. > > > > However, the leverage we have is that the contract on a domain name is time > > limited, with on option to renew. > > > it is not true for all domain. and the "not for all" is important. > > that why we do not support : contract for all RESSOURCE. let choice by > change MUST by MAY. > > Can you provide a counter example? Ian
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]