[address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frederic
frederic at placenet.org
Tue Apr 8 17:29:22 CEST 2008
Le mardi 08 avril 2008 à 16:09 +0100, Ian.Meikle at nominet.org.uk a écrit : > > Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> > > Sent by: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net > > > > 08/04/08 13:29 > > > > To > > > > Frederic <frederic at placenet.org>, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> > > > > cc > > > > Max Tulyev <president at ukraine.su>, "address-policy-wg at ripe.net" > > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> > > > > Subject > > > > Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct > > Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC) > > > > Hi Frederic, > > > > On 08/04/2008 03:58, "Frederic" <frederic at placenet.org> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > why is broken ? because Ripe do not implement relation between PI > holder > > > thru Database information. > > > > > > Dead PI is like Dead Domain name. > > > > This is a fairly good analogy. My understanding of domain names is that > they > > are normally delegated according to a contract with a registry or > registrar. > > If the contract ends the delegation is removed. > > > There is a thriving market in 'dead' domain names. Several of our > registrars base their business models around buying them and reviving them. > For this to work they need to have a contract with us, and they need to pay > a fee per domain name. > > However, the leverage we have is that the contract on a domain name is time > limited, with on option to renew. it is not true for all domain. and the "not for all" is important. that why we do not support : contract for all RESSOURCE. let choice by change MUST by MAY. bst regards. Frederic > If they do not renew then we remove the > domain name from DNS. There is then a time lag before the domain is > released back into the market. In other words, we control service, so we > can enforce the contract. The NCC does not have a similar lever. > > Regards, > > Ian > > Regards, > > Ian >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]