This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hisham R Rojoa
hisham at afrinic.net
Tue May 29 14:43:08 CEST 2007
Please see below again for the AfriNIC region:
-------------------------------------------------
'98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06
-------------------------------------------------
Alloc 10 8 27 28 21 20 43 82 105
Assigned 1 1 0 9 11 11 6 20 19
-------------------------------------------------
rgds
ernest
-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: 29 May 2007 14:56
To: Hisham R Rojoa
Cc: 'Ricardo Patara'; 'Mohacsi Janos'; 'Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet';
'Sascha Lenz'; address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg]
2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider
Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:43:53PM +0400, Hisham R Rojoa wrote:
> If this helps, here is some data from the AfriNIC region:
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Year '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PI /16 0 0 0 0.09 0.33 0.34 0.18 1.41
1.74
> PA /16 1.81 1.13 3.88 5.81 3.70 3.06 7.58 14.36
39.82
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
Actually, the *number* of allocations would be more relevant for PI vs.
PA than the sheer size.
In the RIPE region, we have seen that there is much less *space* being
used for PI - but it is much more fragmented, thus causing more pain in
the routing tables.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A.
Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.1/822 - Release Date:
28/05/2007 11:40
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]