Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ernest Byaruhanga (AfriNIC)
ernest at afrinic.net
Mon May 28 08:07:37 CEST 2007
Mohacsi Janos wrote thus on 05/23/2007 01:59 PM: > > Are there similar statistics in the other RIR area? If the > picture is similar we have in RIPE region, then we have > think over PI address policy.... If this helps, here is some data from the AfriNIC region: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Year '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PI /16 0 0 0 0.09 0.33 0.34 0.18 1.41 1.74 PA /16 1.81 1.13 3.88 5.81 3.70 3.06 7.58 14.36 39.82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ rgds ernest
- Previous message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): Did CIDR teach us nothing? was: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 Discussion Period extended until 19 June 2007 (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]