[address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)

Hello,

Jordi already answered the question specifically about this proposal.

There is a presentation scheduled during RIPE 53 next week, on 5 
October, for Thursday Plenary session. It will give a summary about this 
proposal and others that are common across regions.

Kind regards,
Filiz Yilmaz
RIPE NCC
Policy Development Officer

Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>>Last, but not least, I also will prefer a "common" policy across the
>>different regions, but I think we can't call it "global", because ICANN
>>process, and in any case, it may be very difficult to coordinate that if not
>>too late and impossible ...
> 
> 
> That is actually an issue I'd like to comment on.
> 
> Regarding the use of words, what we can *try* to achieve across the regions is
> a thing that is called "globally coordinated". The first time we applied that
> approach to come up with (almost) identical, or at least very similar, polocies
> in all regions was the (dreaded) "200 Customer rule" for IPv6 PA Allocations.
> 
> Whether it was wise to work towards such a compromise, which in retrospect left
> many in the community unhappy, is a different story...
> 
> So - is anyone in a position to summarize for us which regions are doing that
> already (ARIN afair, others?) and what the size detais are, or which regions
> are working towards such a policy (RIPE obviously is).
> 
> Can the NCC help out here?
> 
> Wilfried.
>