[address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (2006-01)

Hi Wilfried,

I think I can do it, having been in all the RIR meeting since this started
2-3 years ago ...

So in short, at the time being has been implemented only in ARIN, but is in
last call also in APNIC since a couple of weeks ago (last meeting), as an
IPv6 PI policy (using /48) policy achieved consensus.

I've submitted basically the same proposal in LACNIC, AfriNIC and RIPE
service regions, and there is no any other similar proposal in those
regions.

I also submitted it in APNIC but didn't achieved consensus (another proposal
did, as indicated above).

Regards,
Jordi




> De: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" <Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at>
> Organización: UniVie - ACOnet
> Responder a: <Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at>
> Fecha: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:00:39 +0000
> Para: <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> CC: "address-policy-wg at ripe.net" <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Asunto: Re: [address-policy-wg] Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for
> End User Organisations (2006-01)
> 
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> 
> [ ... ]
>> Last, but not least, I also will prefer a "common" policy across the
>> different regions, but I think we can't call it "global", because ICANN
>> process, and in any case, it may be very difficult to coordinate that if not
>> too late and impossible ...
> 
> That is actually an issue I'd like to comment on.
> 
> Regarding the use of words, what we can *try* to achieve across the regions is
> a thing that is called "globally coordinated". The first time we applied that
> approach to come up with (almost) identical, or at least very similar,
> polocies
> in all regions was the (dreaded) "200 Customer rule" for IPv6 PA Allocations.
> 
> Whether it was wise to work towards such a compromise, which in retrospect
> left
> many in the community unhappy, is a different story...
> 
> So - is anyone in a position to summarize for us which regions are doing that
> already (ARIN afair, others?) and what the size detais are, or which regions
> are working towards such a policy (RIPE obviously is).
> 
> Can the NCC help out here?
> 
> Wilfried.
> 




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.