[address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Torunn Narvestad
tna at telenor.net
Tue May 2 18:01:52 CEST 2006
Thor-Henrik Kvandahl wrote: >On Tue, 2 May 2006 Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com wrote: > >>Perhaps someone can clear up my understanding on the ETNO >>question. >> >>Torunn Narvestad <tna at telenor.net> wrote on 30/04/2006 19:44:35: >> >>>I do not at all support this policy proposal. >>> >>>>And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address >>>> >>policy >> >>>>WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the >>>>reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this >>>>proposal". >>>> >>According to this page: http://www.etno.be/Default.aspx?tabid=1239 >>Telenor is a member of ETNO. Does this mean that ETNO has >>falsely claimed unanimous support among its members? >>Or has Telenor changed its mind? >> > >In my email I emphasized that I expressed my *personal* opinion. > I also expressed my *personal* opinion, although I didn't emphasize it so clearly as Thor-Henrik :-) - Torunn -- Torunn Narvestad Telenor Nordic tna at telenor.net +47 47 90 00 96
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]