[address-policy-wg] IPv4-HD-Ratio proposal

On Tue, 2 May 2006 10:17:25 +0100, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com said:
> According to this page: http://www.etno.be/Default.aspx?tabid=1239
> Telenor is a member of ETNO. Does this mean that ETNO has
> falsely claimed unanimous support among its members?

I don't know for sure, but it would be no surprise. These telecoms
organisations are known to have a mind of their own unlike what we're
used to in our consensus-driven community.


> Or has Telenor changed its mind?

Only Telenor can tell ;)

> 
> Earlier Per Heldal asked:
> >Does this mean that ETNO assume they have some form of veto in the RIPE
> >community? I can't see any reason why ETNO's vote should count for more
> >than any other _individual's_ opinion regardless of who they claim to
> >represent.
> 
> Again, perhaps I misunderstand how RIPE works. Per refers to ETNO's vote
> but I thought that ETNO had no vote at all in RIPE working groups.
> My understanding was that individuals have a vote, not organizations.
> Have I misunderstood something here?

I should have used the term "voice" instead of "vote". Sorry about the
confusion. 

Point is; ETNO members should have to stand up for themselves,
individually, if they want to be heard in the community ... just like
everybody else has to. 


//per
-- 
  Per Heldal
  http://heldal.eml.cc/