[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Dec 19 12:12:07 CET 2006
Hi Gert, On Dec 19, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Gert Doering wrote: [...] > I like this more than the previous one, but still some questions > remain: > > - what about the AW for existing LIRs? Will it be auto-raised to /21 > as well? I think this would be part of the implementation. If the LIR had an IPv4 allocation for at least six months and their AW was under /21 then their AW would be raised to /21 - unless it has been reduced by the RIPE NCC because of misuse. > - what about the AW size *after* the initial raise? Can it be > reduced > to less than a /21 - and if yes, under which conditions, and at > what > time will it grow back? Ah, perhaps I should have made it more clear in the updated text. This proposal does not change the current policy text, which states: "The AW may also be lowered after or during an audit if invalid assignments are noted." Regards, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]