[address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Thu Nov 17 18:00:26 CET 2005
Tim Streater wrote: > It should go. We manage a transit network connecting Middle-eastern > and North African national research networks (NRENs). > The aim is that this grouping go independent of us at some point > and manage everything themselves. So in say 10 years you are not managing it anymore? Most NREN's already have plenty of address space, so why not use that address space? > I was able to get v4 PI space for > this from RIPE, but the 200 rule appears to rule out these guys using v6. Oh well. Do you need a /32 full of address space or do you want PI? If you only need a single /48, then requesting a /32 is quite silly don't you think? And also quite a waste. Do note, that this is nothing against you, but if you get a /32 because you want PI, then a lot of other small organisations (read: individuals) may want one. Constructive part, same style as to the NATO one: - You have 50 PoPs. - You have say 150 employees (both can be a plan, you might fail but hell.. it still is a plan) That is already 200. Become LIR and get it. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 238 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20051117/7a852e90/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]