[address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Streater
tim.streater at dante.org.uk
Thu Nov 17 17:23:54 CET 2005
At 16:15 17/11/2005, Marc van Selm wrote: [NATO scenario] >I can't help feeling this rule is written for ISPs but will be counter >productive for NATO and organisations with a very large privately operated >enterprice network. I also can't help the feeling that its a paper tiger. So >isn't there another way to achieve the same result as this rule was intended >for? > >Any views? It should go. We manage a transit network connecting Middle-eastern and North African national research networks (NRENs). The aim is that this grouping go independent of us at some point and manage everything themselves. I was able to get v4 PI space for this from RIPE, but the 200 rule appears to rule out these guys using v6. Oh well. -- Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]