[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Thu Mar 24 17:27:42 CET 2005
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:44:42PM +0000, Jon Lawrence wrote: > On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:44, Daniel Roesen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:55:24PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > > So how exactly do I build a prefix length filter that only applies to > > > allocations and not assignments? > > > > This is why people propose reserving a range for PI assignments, so > > that this range can have different filtering. No rocket science. > > > But Daniel, there's no such thing as v6 PI :) That's what THEY want to make you believe. :-)= > As I read it, they're talking about reserving a block for what would > effectively be micro-allocations no PI. And what's the difference please? Especially since those aren't allocations (you can't assign more-specifics to others) but assignments? Don't play with words. It's IPv6 PI for whoever-is-deemed-special. Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]