This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jon Lawrence
jon at lawrence.org.uk
Thu Mar 24 16:44:42 CET 2005
On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:44, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:55:24PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > So how exactly do I build a prefix length filter that only applies to > > allocations and not assignments? > > This is why people propose reserving a range for PI assignments, so > that this range can have different filtering. No rocket science. > But Daniel, there's no such thing as v6 PI :) As I read it, they're talking about reserving a block for what would effectively be micro-allocations no PI. Jon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]