[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nils Ketelsen
nils at druecke.strg-alt-entf.org
Fri Feb 25 19:12:26 CET 2005
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:00:27PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: > Also for the folks complaining about rootservers getting a /32 and those > not being available to ccTLD servers, why don't you move to the APNIC > region, there even the .jp root has a /32.... And now the next question: If a ccTLD NS gets a /32, why shouldn't a Authoratitative NS for a real big number of Domains (of a domain hoster, for example) get a /32? What is the difference between a ccTLD Nameserver and any other authoritative NS? I think the problem is not, that ccTLD Nameservers do not get a assignment, the problem is much more general: Addresses are assigned in the way that suits ISPs quite nicely but for sites is a major pain in the rear end. As long as this does not change IPv6 will stay what it is today: A nice platform for testing and playing without any business relevance. Nils -- Der Minister nimmt flüsternd den Bischof beim Arm: "Halt Du sie dumm - ich halt sie Arm" [Reinhard Mey, 'Sei Wachsam']
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]