[address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Fri Feb 25 19:00:27 CET 2005
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 17:53 +0100, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: >On Feb 25, 2005, at 1:23 AM, Jon Lawrence wrote: >> >> Be interesting to see what they come back with. >> How can multihoming be suitable to one kind of service and not another >> - I'll >> wait 'til they publish they're docs, you can explain then Iljitsch :) >> (unless >> we're talking locators again). > >Documents are published. Protocol work will be done in new WG. >Architecture published. Multi6 is closing in two weeks. Yes, there will >be identifiers and locators. Shibby... eehmm Shim6 that is ;) Also for the folks complaining about rootservers getting a /32 and those not being available to ccTLD servers, why don't you move to the APNIC region, there even the .jp root has a /32.... Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20050225/2de33ae9/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 access to K-root
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]