[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Tue Dec 6 12:32:01 CET 2005
Hi Sascha, On 12/6/05, Sascha Lenz <slz at baycix.de> wrote: > actually, it's a RIR Policy. So it would be quite quite logical to > follow the RIR policy process and only let RIR-members ("LIR" or > whatever it's called outside RIPE) vote. LIRs in the RIPE region vote only on RIPE NCC activities/budget/association stuff. The Policy Development Process is open to all. This is true in other regions as well. But actually that's what i was thinking about (we're exclusively on RIPE > WG Mailinglists here anyways). I am not an LIR, and I can play in this sandbox! BTW, I live in Africa now, (that's why you don't see me @ meetings anymore), but I can still participate on the lists. -- Cheers, McTim $ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20051206/17a8b8b8/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]