[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Tue Dec 6 12:09:59 CET 2005
Hi, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:09:12AM +0100, Sascha Lenz wrote: >>The only way is to post some detailed policy suggestions and have some >>kind of voting about it, either in public (e.g. usenet-wise) or on >>RIPE/RIR level. > > OK, so now we need to find consensus on how we want to do voting. . o O(...) > - does every LIR get one vote (I hear Daniel Roesen yelling)? > > - does every person on the Internet get one vote? > > - How do you prevent abuse due to "ok, all employees of $big_carrier vote X" > (by coprorate order)? actually, it's a RIR Policy. So it would be quite quite logical to follow the RIR policy process and only let RIR-members ("LIR" or whatever it's called outside RIPE) vote. Don't really know if Daniel would yell on that. But actually that's what i was thinking about (we're exclusively on RIPE WG Mailinglists here anyways). Don't know why i added the "in public" part in first place. No real reason. It would be stupid to think about a "at large" vote on that issue, ICANN failed trying to establish such things :-) -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = Network Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]