[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria

Daniel and all,

  I have to agree with Daniel's assesment here, unfortunately...

Daniel Roesen wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:43:39AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > Indeed.  The idea behind the proposed change is (sort of) "those who can be
> > bothered to understand the system and become a LIR are allowed".
>
> I cannot see any requirement of "understanding the system", just
> "become a LIR", which boils down to "shell out enough money to RIPE
> NCC". Do you follow the illusion that LIRs are more clued on average
> than non-LIRs?
>
> Basically the proposal wants to change:
>
> "People who pay enough money to RIPE NCC and are ISPs (or lie
> convincingly enough) and claim a certain customer count projection"
>
> to
>
> "People who pay enough money to RIPE NCC and are ISPs (or lie
> convincingly enough)"
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
> --
> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827