[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Fri Apr 22 10:45:43 CEST 2005
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:43:39AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Indeed. The idea behind the proposed change is (sort of) "those who can be > bothered to understand the system and become a LIR are allowed". I cannot see any requirement of "understanding the system", just "become a LIR", which boils down to "shell out enough money to RIPE NCC". Do you follow the illusion that LIRs are more clued on average than non-LIRs? Basically the proposal wants to change: "People who pay enough money to RIPE NCC and are ISPs (or lie convincingly enough) and claim a certain customer count projection" to "People who pay enough money to RIPE NCC and are ISPs (or lie convincingly enough)" Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]