[address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeff Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Fri Oct 29 10:44:39 CEST 2004
Kurt and all, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I should know better than replying to this... Well I am sorry you feel that way... > > > On 2004-10-29, at 09.59, Jeff Williams wrote: > > Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > >> On 2004-10-29, at 06.50, Jeff Williams wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Thanks for your explanation. So I guess this means two different > >>> policies because Afnic in this case "requested" such? > >> > >> No. RIPE members brought this to the address-policy WG that discussed > >> this and agreed on it. > >> > >>> Interesting > >>> method of policy determination.. > >> > >> Why? This is how all address-policy is determined. > > > > And there is the curx of the problem... > > Ah...you mean an open and transparent policy process? No of course not... > Ok fare enough. > Most the rest of us think that is a good thing. You're ofcourse free to > disagree. No I am all for it. However if a policy for one is different than for another is that wise? Maybe so, maybe not so... If Afnic is happy with it, great! >;) But is it reasonable to call it a "Policy". Or would it be more accurate to say a "Policy for Afnic" and everyone else has a different policy? Just trying to understand what the criterion if any for determining "Policies" are and should be... But I am happy to see that not one size fits all, if you will pardon the pun... >;) > > > - - kurtis - > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 8.1 > > iQA/AwUBQYHhXKarNKXTPFCVEQKM4wCgwXPOXk125iEJ5C4zPoWT4lAsPGkAoPDd > ovgvWo1X09V8ro0kJXIpOdVX > =WQiB > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" - Pierre Abelard "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]