[address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Fri Oct 29 08:21:08 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I should know better than replying to this... On 2004-10-29, at 09.59, Jeff Williams wrote: > Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: >> On 2004-10-29, at 06.50, Jeff Williams wrote: >> >>> >>> Thanks for your explanation. So I guess this means two different >>> policies because Afnic in this case "requested" such? >> >> No. RIPE members brought this to the address-policy WG that discussed >> this and agreed on it. >> >>> Interesting >>> method of policy determination.. >> >> Why? This is how all address-policy is determined. > > And there is the curx of the problem... Ah...you mean an open and transparent policy process? Ok fare enough. Most the rest of us think that is a good thing. You're ofcourse free to disagree. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQYHhXKarNKXTPFCVEQKM4wCgwXPOXk125iEJ5C4zPoWT4lAsPGkAoPDd ovgvWo1X09V8ro0kJXIpOdVX =WQiB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 policy document and request forms updated
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]