[address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
Joao_Damas at isc.org
Fri Jun 11 20:30:39 CEST 2004
On 11 Jun, 2004, at 16:55, Andreas Bäß/Denic wrote: >>>> Don't you think the policy ought to be more relaxed and allow the >>>> server manager for the zone to decide how many of their servers they >>>> want to anycast? >>> >>> i think the point intended is that the address space *must* be used >>> for anycast, and not just another address grab. yes? > >> Well, no one doubts that is the intention here, that is why I >> suggested >> a different wording earlier, so the motivation is clear. My question >> is, why limit it to anycast one of the servers? > > Can you help me and explain what the advantage of offering multiple > anycast servers in comparison to a single anycast server is? > You put your eggs in more baskets. Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]