[address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Bäß/Denic
baess at denic.de
Fri Jun 11 16:55:06 CEST 2004
> >> Don't you think the policy ought to be more relaxed and allow the > >> server manager for the zone to decide how many of their servers they > >> want to anycast? > > > > i think the point intended is that the address space *must* be used > > for anycast, and not just another address grab. yes? > Well, no one doubts that is the intention here, that is why I suggested > a different wording earlier, so the motivation is clear. My question > is, why limit it to anycast one of the servers? Can you help me and explain what the advantage of offering multiple anycast servers in comparison to a single anycast server is? Andreas
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]