[address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Aug 19 20:40:48 CEST 2003
(I am late in this discussion due to vacation and a crashed laptop) >>>>> And what about public exchange points? >>>> >>>> In which way are ccTLDs related to public exchange points? Or are >>>> you >>>> referring to the discussed "abandon PI" policy change? >> >> In no way ... that was a separate question related to the PI policy >> change. I should have put a "P.S." in front. Sorry for confusion. ;-) > > Okay :-) - I have no clear answer on the exchange point question. Many > of them are LIR already anyway (so they use PA). This is not true. LIR - yes; PA - no. They do not met the requirements. That is part of the problem. > The approach with a > one-time service fee to get "PI-like" space might work out for them. Yes, that was the idea. - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]