[address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oliver Bartels
oliver at bartels.de
Mon Aug 11 12:27:51 CEST 2003
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:36:54 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: >That's an operational problem, not a technical one. > >If IANA/ICANN isn't working, give them a good beating, but please don't >break policy to cover for human deficiencies. Well, the policy is for the humans and not the humans for the policy. We are all *service* providers and thus we should deliver the *service* the customer which the customer demands. If there is a reasonable demand for PI (whether v4 or currently unsolved v6), we should try to do our best to serve this demand. Just my 2 cent for your "I don't like independend address space" position, which I don't believe is the position of the majority of the ISP's. Best Regards Oliver Bartels Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]