I guess they still use RFC 2916 format.
yes, we are still using 2916 format for NAPTR RRs
My *personal* recommendation is to use both 2916 and 2916bis format
i think it's good idea to support both 2916/2916bis for a while. for
a while as software might not be updated yet according to 2916bis.
our "look-up" & "phone book" applications are still based on rfc2916:
On Mar 31, 2004, at 01:29, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
looking at the first number (+48225231300) , I note that the ENUM
The service field is "mailto+E2U" - in RFC2916bis the E2U goes at
the field, NOT the end.
Likewise for the second number.
See ETSI's TS 102 172 for the ETSI spec on Interoperability of
all the best,
On 29 Mar 2004, Andrzej Bartosiewicz wrote:
We are using this domain names for testing in Poland.
Please, do not call me and my friends in the middle of the night...