<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: ENUM domain names in Poland.

  • To: Patrik Fltstrm < >
  • From: Andrzej Bartosiewicz < >
  • Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:15:00 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Cc: "Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)" < >
    Stastny Richard < >
  • Virusprotection: checked - Found to be clean

> I guess they still use RFC 2916 format.

yes, we are still using 2916 format for NAPTR RRs

> My *personal* recommendation is to use both 2916 and 2916bis format for
> a while as software might not be updated yet according to 2916bis.

i think it's good idea to support both 2916/2916bis for a while. for example
our "look-up" & "phone book" applications are still based on rfc2916:
www.dns.pl/cgi-bin/en_enum_lookup.pl
www.dns.pl/ENUM/enumClient.zip

andrzej

>     paf
>
> On Mar 31, 2004, at 01:29, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrzej,
> > looking at the first number (+48225231300) , I note that the ENUM data
> > is broken.
> >
> > The service field is "mailto+E2U" - in RFC2916bis the E2U goes at the
> > start of
> > the field, NOT the end.
> >
> > Likewise for the second number.
> >
> > Sigh.
> >
> > See ETSI's TS 102 172 for the ETSI spec on Interoperability of
> > European trials.
> >
> > all the best,
> >   Lawrence
> >
> > ----
> > On 29 Mar 2004, Andrzej Bartosiewicz wrote:
> > We are using this domain names for testing in Poland.
> >
> > Please, do not call me and my friends in the middle of the night... ;)
> >
> > Andrzej.
> >
> > 0.0.3.1.3.2.5.2.2.8.4.e164.arpa
> > 0.2.9.7.5.0.0.0.6.8.4.e164.arpa
> > <snip>
> >
>




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>