RE: [anti-spam-wg] Any suggestions about how to deal with non co-operative ISP's and RIR's ?
-
From: Jørgen Hovland jorgen@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:07:51 +0200
> I do believe that only if every responsible organisation on the net
cooperate on hacking, spam and other abuse issues - we will be able to do
anything about - otherwise ....
And by spam you mean what you decide is spam, or do you mean that the spam is illegal by law in the country of the ISP and/or the destination country?
Just curious..
Cheers,
j
-----Original Message-----
From: anti-spam-wg-admin@localhost [
] On Behalf Of oca@localhost
Sent: 3. april 2007 10:06
Subject: Re: [anti-spam-wg] Any suggestions about how to deal with non co-operative ISP's and RIR's ?
Blocking the ISP, in one or another way, is ofcourse a way to deal with spam
from a given ISP ...
But this is only a short-term ( selfish ) solution and dosn't solve the root
for my frustrations - namely that the ISP and the RIR dosn't seem willing to
cooperate...
Besides this - technically - blocking isn't possible for me ... I'm sitting
behind a mail relay belonging to my ISP..
Anyway - I appreciate that I'm not the only one feeling p... off by this
matter.
I do believe that only if every responsible organisation on the net
cooperate on hacking, spam and other abuse issues - we will be able to do
anything about - otherwise ....
Ole
----- Original Message -----
From: "peter h" peter@localhost
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [anti-spam-wg] Any suggestions about how to deal with non
co-operative ISP's and RIR's ?
On Monday 02 April 2007 08.50, oca@localhost wrote:
> Any suggestions about how to deal with non co-operative ISP's and RIR's ?
>
> When I receive a spam mail, I normally send a spam repport to the "abuse
> mail account" of the ISP being responsible for the IP address using the
> whois databases of the RIR's.
>
> Normally this works very fine ... or rather ... I'm often able to deliver
> the repport somewhere without any problems.
>
> But in some cases the given account dosn't exist or is hidden behind a
> spamfilter..
>
> In these cases I have tried to contact the RIR of the ISP but with very
> different outcome ...
>
> Some RIR's consider this as a problem they can deal with and some dosn't
> !!!
>
> Last week I received a third spam mail from an ip address belonging to
> charter.net...
>
> According to the whois of arin, and to the homepage of the ISP, I should
> repport abuse to abuse@localhost...
>
> This I have tried several times getting an "unable to deliver" repport
> every
> time ...
>
> Trying to raise this as an issue for ARIN gives this repply:
>
> > ARIN is an IP registry whose primary function is the registration and
> > distribution of IP number resources (IP addresses and Autonomous System
> > Numbers) in North America.
> >
> > IP number resource registration information can be found in the
> > public ARIN WHOIS database found at:
> >
> >
http://www.arin.net/whois/
> >
> > Please understand that ARIN does not operate any of the networks
> > contained
> > in the WHOIS database nor is ARIN responsible for supplying and
> > maintaining the registration data in the WHOIS database. That
> > responsibility lies soley with the registrant of the data.
>
> How do we fight spam, and other kind of abuse, as long as some of the
> ISP's
> and the RIR's has this kind of attitudes ?
>
> Ole
>
>
The solution is - block them. Either subscribe on a blocklist that fills the
need or block the offending ISP's yourself. IP ranges is easily
available by "whois"
The downside is that _if_ someone is within that ISP's net they are
not able to mail you, but a proper "bounce-message" ( "Use gmail or any
other
serious mailprovider" ) or punch a hole in you block when needed.
The only real pressure that can be applied to unserious ISP is to
threat their income. Make their customers complain and eventually
abandom them.
--
Peter Håkanson
There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it
again ... and again ... and again ... and again.
( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
