Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists

  • From: Walter Ian Kaye walter@localhost
  • Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:05:38 -0700

At 06:23a +0200 08/24/2006, Paul Wouters didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus:

On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Esa Laitinen wrote:

ps. I receive the mailing list perfectly, no need for personal
copies of messages.

	:0 Wh: msgid.lock
	| formail -D 8192 ~/.procmail/msgid.cache

Or ask the list maintainer to change the Reply-To, because to not
send you a duplicate, I have to remove you from the To:, which then
becomes empty, and I have to move the list address from the CC: into
the To: or else you;ll complain about an empty To:.

Well we all have to do it. So if the rest of us do, then it can't be that hard. ;) But I would also vote for Reply-To munging, and I think 'Precedence: list' goes along with that?