<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- To: Esa Laitinen <esa.laitinen@localhost
- From: Paul Wouters paul@localhost
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Esa Laitinen wrote:
And it is easy for an outsider to say somebody is a lame administrator.
A system I use does a resend generally 12-24 hours after the first delivery try for performance reasons. This quite often trows off the greylisting. Which admin is lame, the one that uses greylisting, or the one that has config which delays the retry? IMHO the greylister.
I'd say you. 12-24 hours delay should really not be neccessary. Paul
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Esa Laitinen
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Michele Neylon:: Blacknight.ie
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Peter Dambier
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Sabri Berisha
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Peter Dambier
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Paul Wouters
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
- [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Emanuele Balla
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: pna . lists
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Esa Laitinen
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |