[anti-abuse-wg] Support and comments - prop 2010-08

First - I support the addition of a mandatory abuse-mailbox: field in
the IRT object.

I have two caveats to raise -

1. There is no requirement that the contact information be accurate
(that the mailbox exists and is monitored, action taken on reports)

2. There is no mention of what action should / will be taken in case
this contact information turns out to be wrong (or deliberately faked)

thanks
suresh

This statement of support is in my personal capacity as an antispam
volunteer and postmaster for the past 15 years, and does not represent
any statement or commitment made by my employer.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 300 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101117/b4747972/attachment.sig>