[anti-abuse-wg] Support and comments - prop 2010-08

On 17/Nov/10 14:11, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> First - I support the addition of a mandatory abuse-mailbox: field in
> the IRT object.

+1

> 1. There is no requirement that the contact information be accurate
> (that the mailbox exists and is monitored, action taken on reports)
> 
> 2. There is no mention of what action should / will be taken in case
> this contact information turns out to be wrong (or deliberately faked)

I hope theses issues will be addressed next.