[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com
Tue Sep 11 10:21:01 CEST 2012
* Erik Bais >> I also note that the Impact Analysis warns that this policy may >> lead to increased fees for members, which would be an undesirable >> consequence. I don't feel that the members should be sponsoring the >> non-members; equal access to addresses from the last /8 should mean >> equal monetary contribution to the NCC. > > Does that mean that you want the sponsored PI assignments get the > same cost as a direct assignment (1300 euro yearly maintenance per > object) ? Yes, something along those lines would be good. BTW: This would, as I understand it, be in the same ballpark as what you would have to pay if you want a PI assignment from APNIC's last /8. > Snip from your email: > >> In principle, I support this proposal. > >> (Just to be clear: I am not stating neither support or opposition >> to the proposal.) > > Which one is it? Neither. I haven't made up my mind yet, so I'm thinking out loud... -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]