[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
erik at bais.name
Tue Sep 11 10:04:40 CEST 2012
Hi Tore, The cost for services is something that isn't discussed on the APWG, but on the member-discuss mailinglist. Cost changes are to be decided in the (RIPE meeting) AGM meeting and the current cost for a LIR sign-up is 2000 euro setup and 1300 yearly maintenance. It is not possible to change the cost for LIR sponsored PI via a policy. > I also note that the Impact Analysis warns that this policy may lead to increased fees for members, which would be an undesirable consequence. I don't feel that the members should be sponsoring the non-members; equal access to addresses from the last /8 should mean equal monetary contribution to the NCC. Does that mean that you want the sponsored PI assignments get the same cost as a direct assignment (1300 euro yearly maintenance per object) ? Snip from your email: > In principle, I support this proposal. > (Just to be clear: I am not stating neither support or opposition to the proposal.) Which one is it? Regards, Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]