[address-policy-wg] Comment on 2006-05 (PI Assignment Size)

Hello,

I support this proposal too.

And I think LIRs should be more face to client and a bit educate them
about real situation before evaluating requests ;)

Michał Mirosław wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I support the 2006-05 proposal. We have one client who insisted
> on getting PI space, but they qualified for at most /27. Then we
> had to actually request that /27 and have them expierience what
> prefix filtering does to small PI networks.
> 
> Alternative way to solve this would be to designate one /8 (or longer;
> divided among regional registries) that contained only prefixes
> longer than /24. It would allow for small PI's, be easy to configure
> filters for, and have a limited influence on global routing table size.
> But it would need agreement all over the internet.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Michal Miroslaw
> NASK
> 


-- 
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)