[address-policy-wg] Comment on 2006-05 (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comment on 2006-05 (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michał Mirosław
Michal.Miroslaw at nask.pl
Tue Oct 24 13:02:29 CEST 2006
Hello, I support the 2006-05 proposal. We have one client who insisted on getting PI space, but they qualified for at most /27. Then we had to actually request that /27 and have them expierience what prefix filtering does to small PI networks. Alternative way to solve this would be to designate one /8 (or longer; divided among regional registries) that contained only prefixes longer than /24. It would allow for small PI's, be easy to configure filters for, and have a limited influence on global routing table size. But it would need agreement all over the internet. Best Regards, Michal Miroslaw NASK -- Michal Miroslaw <Michal.Miroslaw at nask.pl> PL > NASK > Network Administration Division > IP Team
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comment on 2006-05 (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]