<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
"scoring" of results
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:00:27 +0100
Hi,
This is my first message to the list, so I hope this wasn't discussed before...
Following the discussion at RIPE35 about "scoring" the results, I would like make the following suggestions:
1. Keep the results for latency and packet loss separate. This gives a finer notation.
2. Divide latency by the "real" distance between hosts. Given the fact that they all have a GPS receiver, they should be able to give very precise location, can't they? This would make sure that test-boxes away from the larger groups don't get "bad" scores.
Comments?
Jacques.
--- Jacques Caron
PSINetworks Europe Network Engineer
PSINet Europe Regional Peering Coordinator
Planete.net IT Manager
Mail: 8/10 rue Nieuport - 78140 Velizy - France
Phone: +33 (0)1 34 63 19 71 - Fax: +33 (0)1 34 63 19 51
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "scoring" of results
- From: Henk Uijterwaal \(RIPE-NCC\)
- Re: "scoring" of results
- References:
- Slides of last week
- From: Henk Uijterwaal \(RIPE-NCC\)
- Slides of last week
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |