New RIPE NCC Website
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 13:52:54 +0100 (CET)
Dear Colleagues,
In case you have not seen this message before:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ripe-list@localhost
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 6:04 PM
> To: Local Internet Registries in Europe; Reseaux IP Europeens
> Subject: New RIPE NCC Website
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> The RIPE NCC is happy to announce the launch of its re-structured
> Website.
>
> The aim was to provide users of the site with more structure and ease
> of use without eliminating the clarity of the pages which have
> received recognition in the past.
>
> With the new structure in place, we hope that you will find it
> easy to navigate through the site and find all of the information
> you require. The site also marks the launch of the new RIPE NCC
> logo.
>
> A special thanks to all who have provided input to the new site.
>
> Naturally, any errors can be reported to webmaster@localhost.
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Rendek
> Communications Officer
>
> -----Original Message-----
Please note that this means that many of the URL's on our site have
been changed, including:
1. The Test-Traffic Measurements homepage:
http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/ttm/
2. The Test-Traffic Measurements daily plots page:
http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/ttm/Plots
(This page is, as before, only accessible to sites hosting a test-box).
3. Routing Information Service (RIS) pages:
http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/np/ris-index.html
Please replace any bookmarks pointing to these pages that you may have.
Kind regards,
Henk Uijterwaal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal@localhost
RIPE Network Coordination Centre WWW: http://www.ripe.net/home/henk
Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.535-4414, Fax -4445
1016 AB Amsterdam Home: +31.20.4195305
The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Committee (...) was unable to reach a consensus that substantial merit was
lacking. Thus, the appeal was deemed meritorious. (Orlando NABC #19).
