Should Two Letter TLDs Be Immune ?

It goes back to the original comment.  

Good idea, we can suggest it but we cannot force them to do it.

On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Jim Fleming wrote:

> On Monday, April 27, 1998 12:37 PM, Steve Heflin[SMTP:steve at domainbank.net] wrote:
> @Why don't we establish a set of guidelines or purported guidelines we feel
> @may be pertinent, *then* move forward with issues regarding each?
> @
> @[not purposely avoiding the question] ;)
> @
> 
> One of the things that I have advocated in the past
> is the 2+2+4 Trustee structure. This is a structure
> that allows 8 people to be identified as the delegates
> of a resource such as a TLD.
> 
> 		5_________
> 	3_________
> 		6_________
> 1_________
> 2_________
> 		7_________
> 	4_________
> 		8_________
> 
> 
> With this structure the people in the #1 and #2 positions
> are viewed as the co-Trustees and share the job. They
> speak for the TLD when an official statement is needed.
> Each of them has an assistant (#3 and #4). Then each
> of those people has two people to help provide more
> community coverage and voices.
> 
> I wonder if each of the 2 letter TLDs could publish such
> a list ?
> 
> 
> -
> Jim Fleming
> Unir Corporation
> IBC, Tortola, BVI
> 
> http://www.nic.vi
> 
> 

Regards

Steve Heflin
Domain Bank, Inc.
IDomains, Inc.




-------- Logged at  Tue Apr 28 03:08:00 MET DST 1998  ---------