Some more comments on components
Gilles Farrache
Thu May 26 10:44:04 CEST 1994
Hi Marten,
Here comes a new day and some more comment on the component
management.
Let's assume the following configuration :
---AS2-----------AS1
!
---AS3------------!
AS1 is connected to AS2 and AS3 and cannot be used for transit
trafic. At a first stage the routes entries for AS1 are :
route: 193.0.8.0/24
origin: AS1
component: 193.0.8.1/32 AS2
component: 193.0.8.2/32 AS3
route: 193.0.9.0/24
origin: AS1
Then AS2 and AS3 start to agregate and that gives two entries :
route: 193.0.0.0/20
origin: AS2
component: 193.0.0.0/23 HOLE
component: 193.0.8.0/23 AS1
component: 193.0.12.0/22 HOLE
and
route: 193.0.0.0/20
origin: AS3
component: 193.0.2.0/23 HOLE
component: 193.0.4.0/22 HOLE
component: 193.0.8.0/23 AS1
component: 193.0.10.0/23 HOLE
but on which entry are we going to put the old component stuff
(the interace IP address) ? On the first ? On the second ? On
both ? And from step to step we are going to end with objects
completly unmanageable.
In the case of a dmzhost object this will not occur.
Gilles
-------- Logged at Thu May 26 18:02:41 MET DST 1994 ---------
[ rr-impl Archive ]