[asn32] Re: RPSL support for 32 bit ASN

Denis Walker wrote:

>> It would seem sensible to follow the draft rather than create
>> confusion by trying something different. Of course some implements may
>> not have a bounds check on the max size of an AS number.
> 
> But they may consider it to be an integer and the new syntax will be x.y.

I should have made it clearer that the two comments were separate. I 
think that it would be best to reflect the usage in the draft but it 
might also be the case that the current software would "support" a 
single integer purely because the size of the number wasn't checked.

Mark.