Separate attributes vs context-aware software [RE: RPS WG (was Re: [Rps] Re: Latest RPSLng draft)]

>> then let me register my support for the issues and approaches
>> marc raises.  perhaps the system is for the benefit of operations
>> more than the ease of registries?
> There are a number of operators that run their own registries (e.g.
> Level3, Verio, C&W, etc.).   Ping Lu (formerly of C&W) was very vocal
> about preserving the syntax of existing RPSL attributes.

thanks for representing operations.  but i are one.  and i have a
(small) registry.  i want the operational fix, thanks.

randy