[Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard

Curtis Villamizar wrote:

> Any AS object that provides policy already has many import and export
> statements.  Today IPv4 and IPv6 policy does not match so different
> statements are needed anyway.  For example, AS3561 has 737 import
> statements and 738 export statements.  I would venture to guess their
> IPv6 policy is a lot simpler.
> 

My high level policy (ignoring encoding it in some language) is likely 
to be the same irrespective of whether it is IPv4 or IPv6. My 
_application_ of that policy to a peer may be different, ie if the peer 
doesn't speak IPv4 there would be no need to include any IPv4 components.

Mark.