[Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
Mark Prior mrp at mrp.net
Tue Sep 16 13:09:43 CEST 2003
Curtis Villamizar wrote: > Any AS object that provides policy already has many import and export > statements. Today IPv4 and IPv6 policy does not match so different > statements are needed anyway. For example, AS3561 has 737 import > statements and 738 export statements. I would venture to guess their > IPv6 policy is a lot simpler. > My high level policy (ignoring encoding it in some language) is likely to be the same irrespective of whether it is IPv4 or IPv6. My _application_ of that policy to a peer may be different, ie if the peer doesn't speak IPv4 there would be no need to include any IPv4 components. Mark.
[ rpslng Archives ]